Posted in: BBC, Preview, TV | Tagged: bbc, disney plus, doctor who, iplayer

Doctor Who: BBC Confirms No "An Unearthly Child" for iPlayer Library

The BBC confirmed that the late writer Anthony Coburn's episodes ("An Unearthly Child") will not be included in iPlayer's Doctor Who library.

Over the weekend, we learned from Stef Anthony Coburn that the BBC would not be getting the rights to the late writer Anthony Coburn's episodes – the first four Doctor Who episodes – and explaining why he's playing hardball with the media company. Anthony Coburn was a staff writer for the BBC in 1963 when he began working with story editor David Whitaker on the early development of what would become the long-running series – taking their respective turns at the project. During his early run on the show, Anthony Coburn penned four episodes – including "An Unearthly Child" and "The Robots" (aka, "The Masters of Luxor"). What followed were some heated social media exchanges between Stef Anthony Coburn and others calling into question who had or didn't have the rights to those stories. Well, we now know one group that definitely doesn't have the rights – with the BBC confirming to RadioTimes.com that "An Unearthly Child" won't be included in the massive streaming library (800+ episodes, spinoffs, and more) about to hit BBC iPlayer beginning November 1st. "This massive iPlayer back catalogue will be home to over 800 hours of 'Doctor Who' content, making it the biggest ever collection of 'Doctor Who' programming in one place but will not include the first four episodes as we do not have all the rights to those," a BBC spokesperson confirmed.

Doctor Who: Stef Anthony Coburn, BBC & "An Unearthly Child"

Earlier this month, Stef Anthony Coburn took to Twitter/X to announce that the BBC had offered him a "pittance" to relicense the episodes after the writer's son had canceled a further renewal of the license "a while back." Less than a week later, while awaiting word on a response to his counter-offer, Stef Anthony Coburn returned to Twitter/X to argue that he wasn't looking to penalize the fans but to hold the BBC accountable for how he claims it treated his father and his works. "In 1976 the BBC without asking permission or offering payment first registered my desperately ill father's IP as THEIR trademark, before (by gross professional negligence or deliberate intent) KILLING HIM!" Stef Anthony Coburn posted at one point – adding later that "vengeance" is his main reason for holding out until he gets what he wants from the BBC. Here's a look at Stef Anthony Coburn's first tweet – followed by a transcript of his complete post between October 7th and today.

A while back I cancelled the BBC's license to show (or use in any way) my late father's four (first ever) Doctor Who episodes, comprising 'The Tribe of Gum'.

NOW they offer me a pittance, to relicense them.

I sent them my counter-offer, instead.

Let's see how much they want them?

Since posting this, I've been (predictably) assailed by a swarm of biting midges, regarding whose collective UNQUALIFIED crap, I care, not one tiny bit! The BBC behaved ABOMINABLY towards my late father (& his estate). I do NONE of this merely for money; but to right past wrongs.

I'll add:

I can think of very few (all, knowledgeably supportive) DW enthusiasts, whom I have ANY personal regard for.
While I don't give a toss if the rest have access to Tony's episodes, or not, MY quarrel, is with the BBC; not the fans of their longest-running children's show.

But, to those, who doubtless will not be able to help themselves: by all means, knock yourselves out, pushing your entitled outrage, &/or ignorant 'opinions' (to use the mildest word imaginable in the circumstances) back at me. You'll get MORE satisfaction, pissing into the wind.

You're ALL missing the point.

In 1976 the BBC without asking permission or offering payment first registered my desperately ill father's IP as THEIR trademark, before (by gross professional negligence or deliberate intent) KILLING HIM!

You think I give a DAMN about anything else?

Those who have seen (or read) 'The Princess Bride', should bring to mind, the quest & repeated intention, of Inigo Montoya, to avenge his father's death at the hand of the 6 fingered man, for a FAR better understanding of my motivation. 'Doctor Who' is otherwise IRRELEVANT to me.

In this case of course, the situation IS more complex. There are OTHER as yet unfulfilled projects & aspirations of Tony's (of one of which, I was a significant part, in his final year), which I would like to see brought to fruition. If DW is my ONLY available leverage. So be it!

Even IF the ONLY thing that results, is the frustration of the desires &/or future convenience, of my (unless or until they apologise, & make what restitution they still can) avowed enemy, then, THAT, regardless of the cost, otherwise to myself, will have been worth the struggle.

In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti, Amen.

So it seems, it's the BBC, who don't give a damn, about the fans.

Relative to the exorbitant sums, they pay to their 'celebs', the sum I quoted was NOT unreasonable.

They've just informed me, by email, that they will NOT now be including 'The Tribe of Gum' in their iPlayer list'.

In the following follow-up tweets/xs, Stef Anthony Coburn explains that what's currently available to stream won't be around much longer once the license expires and isn't renewed – and then confirms that the episodes will not be included on iPlayer, having received an email rejecting his offer:

And here's a look at Stef Anthony Coburn's latest update, stating that "As matters stand, they [BBC] will NEVER AGAIN have the right to distribute Tony's episodes" while adding that he intends to publish his father's "precursor draft-scripts" and "accompanying notes" – here's a look:

Enjoyed this? Please share on social media!

Stay up-to-date and support the site by following Bleeding Cool on Google News today!